翻訳と辞書 |
Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz : ウィキペディア英語版 | Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz
''Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz'' (1986) (C-170/84 ) is an EU labour law case, that sets out the test for objective justification for indirect discrimination. ==Facts== Karin Weber von Hartz was a part-time worker, who had worked for 15 years at Bilka-Kaufhaus. She was refused pension payments under her contract with her employer Bilka-Kaufhaus, which required her to have worked full time for 15 years. She had a German state pension, on top, however. She claimed this was sex discrimination under the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (TEEC) art icle119 (now TFEU art 157). She alleged that women work more part-time, so they are at a disadvantage. Bilka-Kaufhaus argued it was justified in excluding part-time workers because there are higher administrative costs for giving pensions to part-time workers, given the work they do. They also said 81.3 per cent of all occupational pensions were paid to women, even though only 72% of employees were women, so the scheme was unrelated to sex discrimination. Weber started proceedings are a German Labour Court ((ドイツ語:Arbeitsgericht)). The decision was appealed to the Federal Labour Court ((ドイツ語:Bundesarbeitsgericht)), which decided to stay proceedings and ask for a preliminary ruling to the European Court of Justice (ECJ).
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|